Valuing values
Knightshift - 6th June 2001
Values. Almost the word of the moment, if you exclude Millennium
and sex@internet.
You have to give value to shareholders, customers and various
rabble commonly known as stakeholders. And to give value you have
to have values. This means you have to be clean and be seen to
be clean.
Stakeholders may smoke fragrant substances, sniff things other
than snuff and engage in late-night discussions with their neighbours'
spouses, but businesses must refrain from such behaviour for they
are judged on a very narrow set of ethical principles normally
reserved for those in public or clerical office.
This appears to be the reality of doing business today, especially
for those with a strong brand to defend. Just ask Fyffes (fruit),
Gap (clothing), Levi (jeans), Nestle (food), Nike (never heard
of them), Pepsi, Shell and Wal-Mart and they'll tell you a thing
or two about the pitfalls of human rights, worker's rights, health
and safety at work, child labour, environmental standards, dictatorships
and minimum wages.
It's difficult to measure the effect on the brand from contravening
the social value systems of customers. Share prices don't necessarily
dip and brand share does not immediately slip. But those who build
and protect brands generally agree that it's best to skirt the
minefield of societal taboos.
And the best way to do this is to align company values with those
of society. When the company values those things that society
values (but does not necessarily practice) - honesty, integrity,
openness - then it stands are good chance of protecting its reputation
and the brands on which the company depends.
But merely being good is not good enough. You have to be SEEN
to be good. And this is where companies are struggling to work
out the best ways of communicating their virtues without revealing
too many of their blemishes.
Do they do it by report - social reports are favoured by some
- or should they be more subtle, or indeed more innovative? The
jury is out but there's clearly a lot of thought going into it.
We will certainly see more use of the Internet and we might, for
example, see a greater dependence on advertising to re-inforce
messages about corporate values.
This will be a great opportunity both for the creative industries
and for the business of sustainability, which needs an injection
of common touch if it is to be understood by more than a few bearded
worthies in NGOs and government.
What''s clear is that keeping quiet about values adds no value
to companies. They've got to get out there and shout in the most
ethically polite way possible. Of course, they've also got to
ensure they've got something to shout about. But who says doing
business will ever get easier?